Tuesday, August 22, 2017

Monet, Claude (1900). Waterloo Bridge, Grey Weather [oil on canvas]. The Art Institute of Chicago. All rights reserved.

It is my understanding that London at the turn of the century was dangerously congested with people and pollution. Monet has titled this work “Grey Weather”, so I take that to mean that the combination of artificial and natural fog is the result of this hyper-impressionist work in the afternoon. In spite of the dreary and dirty subject matter, this work is simply beautiful. | 
The carefully framed arcade of Waterloo Bridge and the dense, bustling traffic it supports is the subject of this amazing painting. Monet’s formal and stylistic choices effectively communicate the dreary, tainted impression of work and life in this thriving, yet impersonal, setting. Overlapping freehand strokes are blended by the eye to create the impression of water, artificial structures, the solid mass of a crowd and a polluted background. Dramatic value, restricted color purity, spatial pattern and global texture are beautifully fleshed out across the canvas based on this foundation of tiny gestural strokes.
The illusion of spatial depth is simply remarkable in this work. There is a distinct angled/flat foreground to background configuration. Diminishing detail, color purity calibration and atmospheric perspective unite in an indistinguishable manner. Most beautiful of all, in my opinion, is the subtle yet effective use of intuitive convergence Monet employs with the angle of the individual arches that create the bridge. This scene is based on optical reality, and even so the heavy abstraction of the scene still results in approximate symmetry of a visually believable depiction.
Tension is created through the interplay of curved and perpendicular edges, moments of extreme value contrast, calibration of detail and the proximity of delicate dense greens and light golds. Value variety is equal to purity restriction. Global texture, and a severely stunted and analogous color scheme harmonize. If I were forced to choose a single strength from the harmonizing and contrasting strategies in this painting, it would be how the polluted golds raising from the skyline are reflected in the edge-identifiable water waves in the foreground to unify the entire canvas.
The single most pleasing pattern created by Monet in this painting is the arcade that bisects the horizontal midsection of the canvas. This is simply exquisite: Positive and negative space are expertly created through stark contrasts in value. The viewer seems to be a distance away from the subject, and at an elevated angle to it. The dimensions and placement of the picture frame is done in such a way as to cause it to melt away from awareness, maximizing the impact of the subject matter it frames. 
In the tradition of O’Keeffe and Nix (or in the tradition he created with respect to these two artists), Monet rendered the same subject dozens of times under different lighting and weather conditions. Aside from the amazing and varied strengths already mentioned, Monet has communicated as well as anyone I can think of the impression of bustling activity deadening on the ears due to thick, tainted air. I would venture to say Monet, evidenced by works such as this one, is the next advancement from Seurat. 


No comments:

Post a Comment