Monday, August 21, 2017

Mitchell, Joan (1992). Untitled (oil on canvas). Robert Miller Gallery.

This is a pretty good example of a painting that comes across as inaccessible. I believe harmony is established through stroke width and extremes of color purity. Stark contrasts are made with the different colors and varying stroke directions (meandering, perpendicular). Most of the pigment looks as if it were applied unmixed directly from the source, a glaring weakness in this work. | 
The elements used to create this painting are the subject; nothing is recognizable beyond smears of pigment that gravitate into a somewhat solid mass of themselves. They seem to imply a sense of gravity, volume and swirling motion. Color and line are inseparable components of a single visual whole. A single mass is created through horizontal (to the upper portion of the mass), vertical (toward the bottom) and swirling stroke directions. A combination of pure and dense colors carry more of the workload in creating the sense of mass toward the center of the picture plane. The dense and muddy hues shape the body while the lighter colors create what could be described as highlights. If this work has a color scheme, it is built on a blue/orange complementary one. 
It is clear that key does not establish pigment application chronology. Even so, the denser colors, huddled more toward the mass’ center, seem to sink in further than the lighter ones. I would argue this work exhibits approximate symmetry and a sense of pictorial energy. This tension is caused by the implied swirling movement of the strokes that create the mass, which seems suspended in space.
Generous application of pigment dominates, but there are notable areas of negative space where trace amounts of pigment were used. Further contrasts are built through color temperature, color purity, stroke direction and the global light-dark-light vertical value structure of the entire picture plane. Consistent application of pigment throughout builds a pleasing, organic sense of texture. Stroke width, "directionality", and overall style serve to harmonize this work. 
Minimal attention is paid to the upper and lower thirds of the canvas; all energy and movement is centered in the middle third. There, thick values provide the backdrop for the strongly contrasting slight, high-key values to shine against. The picture edge is used in a contradictory manner. A few strokes are cropped by it, bringing attention to the only mathematically rigid edges in the entire work. However, it is clear that the mass is a fixed width and height, resulting in an impression that the picture frame’s dimensions are in error. 
A combination of balance and contrast characteristic of elementally unified works is present. A major strength of this work is to show how related and starkly contrasting colors can be related with intermediate muddy or neutral colors or values. 


No comments:

Post a Comment