The transition from the Neolithic to bronze/iron age expression specific to the Near East is evident in at least two ways. The figure’s body is rendered with the stiff, planar formatting consistent with works such as the Votive Statue of Gudea and the figures found on the Stele of Hammurabi. In addition, the connected, heavy brows, idealized facial features and enlarged eyes are a combination of formal choices common in ancient Near Eastern art. A break from common works of the era is the reference to time. Seen from straight-on, the figure assumes a pose of absolute militaristic discipline. Seen from the side, it strides forward at an even pace, referencing separate moments depending on the perspective of the observer.
As typical with ancient works, the degree of abstraction is directly related to the conceptual intention of the sponsor, who almost always wields considerable political and/or religious power. As is typical with most artistic expression throughout time, unbalanced harmonies overpower interest-generating equivalencies. In this case, form severity, line and shape geometry and defined, abstracted texture bind while the conceptual combination of human, fanastical and animal subjects demand interest (not to mention the dramatic size of the figures).
No comments:
Post a Comment