This is a strictly symmetrical work of objective abstraction that favors
organization in every expressive manner. Rectilinear forms frame the
composition, which is effectively two registers. They contrast in their formal
relationship to nature: The top is purely geometric, the lower creatures and
figures. The lower register, due to the interactions, carries the most
expressive and interest-generating energy of this composition. The central
figures seem to be waterfowl mounted or attacked by a Swedish hawk. They are
bracketed by crouching front-view people being attacked by wolf-like creatures,
also in profile. A graceful interplay of rigid and curvilinear edges is
distributed throughout.
I believe the use of beasts, animals and
people in vaguely conflicting interactions is a simple expression of the
culture from which it came, similar to the concise, crisply-defined logotypes
and signatures that are popular in American media today. Both are effortless works
of design to their respective cultures. One detail that makes this work quite different
from almost all work I can identify is the subordination of value. Chromatic
color carries much more expressive
weight, dominated by crimsons and midtones, and accented by an exquisite
distribution of tinted royal blues. When the form-defining golds are
incorporated, as they should be, a primary triadic color scheme is revealed.
When edges are
defined by line, generally they express a difference between a surface and the
space around it. In this case, similar to the radiant stained-glass expressive
accomplishments of the French Gothic era, thick strokes define adjacent forms
in this work. This shared-edge gestalt is primarily responsible for this works planar
depth. Pictorial balance is quite static, but there are a number of subtle
sources of interest in this work, including tensions generated between small
and minuscule forms, reds versus golds and middling versus light tones (consistent
with color).
No comments:
Post a Comment